A Male Perspective: 50 Shades of…

Written By: Male Correspondent #2

[editors note: This is a response to our Bitchy Book Club post]

This goddamn book. It’s been quite the talk at work – mostly because I work with 40-something soccer moms whose main source of excitement is a sale on Lunchables at the grocery store. These people haven’t been so fixated on something since Kate Middleton’s wedding, and after reading this book, I’ve decided that is exactly its target audience.

That’s right, I’ll admit it. I’m a heterosexual male who usually reads nonfiction, and I read 50 Shades of Grey. Since I’ve just outed myself, I feel obligated to explain why.

I read it primarily because I wanted to see what the fuss was about. I wanted to see what was making every sexually deprived woman in the country have to change her panties (well, these kinds of women wear “undergarments”) 3 times a day. I wanted to read what was making otherwise sexless, missionary position wives suddenly Google the hell out of “steel balls I can put in my vagina.”

Everyone knows the stereotypical male standards by which society forces women into eating disorders: thin, huge breasted women looking like they’re just starving to go down on every guy standing in the grocery isle looking back at them. I wanted to get a sense of the opposite. In other words, I knew this book was the quintessential fantasy for a certain cross section of the female population, therefore I wanted to get a sense, as a guy, as to what incredible and unattainable standards were on that list.

Second, the book is everywhere. From SNL parodies, to seeing the paperback butterflying across vacant beach chairs, to what the girl across from you has on her kindle during your subway ride. Not that I was prying. Once in a while I feel like I have to tap into pop culture even realizing it probably isn’t something I’ll like – it’s why I downloaded an Adele song once. It’s probably why you felt you wanted to blog about it in the first place.

Third, I knew this book contained graphic sex, and (bonus!) from a female perspective. And really guys, who doesn’t want to read that?

So one day, per my request, a coworker snuck it into my office in a non-descript bag and said “have it back to me in a few weeks, my neighbor wants to borrow it next.” Suddenly I flashed back to age 14, when my buddies and I used to smuggle Penthouse magazines to each other with the “try not to get the pages too sticky” disclaimer.

I expected to read steamy pages filled with erotic detail – the kind that makes you realize you haven’t exhaled in about five seconds, while you drive recklessly home from work with a zipper-breaking boner, so you can furiously jerk off to the that chapter you read during your last conference call. I found no such thing.

I hate this fucking book. I’ve never read something so completely unrealistic in my life. So while you’ve written about why it sucks from your perspective, allow me to speak to a few points from the perspective of someone armed with a penis.

- You already hit on this point, but this author couldn’t be more repetitive. I literally said out loud once, “if she flushes one more time, I’m going lose my fucking head.” Aside from that, unless you have a bizarre capillary disease, no one blushes that much. No one. I really want to mail this author a thesaurus, and ask her to find other words for: someone’s breath hitching (wtf does that even mean?), pursed lips, prickly scalp, biting lip, and “down there.” Oh and if you ever ask me to put something inside “your sex” you will see my erection deflate and zip around the room like an untied party balloon.

- And yes we get it. He’s good looking, but no human being is this good looking. Yes, his pants hang off his hips. The copper highlights of his hair, the blazing eyes..really, you couldn’t even draw someone so perfect. But we also have to hear in excruciating detail, what he’s wearing. I just picture two girls sharing a tub of bon bons, while one is describing him, and the other is squealing with delight at each detail. It’s as if the author is satisfying the burning question of the stereotypical female reader, “but what was he wearing!?!? *squeal*” The answer of course, is usually some sort of linen. Pants hanging of the hips, of course.

- Also, enough about his eyes. They’re burning. Then they’re dark. They’re smoldering, they’re steel, they’re intense…Christ, if they ever make this into a movie they’re going to need to give the lead actor a pair of remote controlled, mood reflecting contacts made from rare African chameleon skin. My palm started twitching just reading this.

- Now, let me get this straight – this college senior who it seems has never graduated from 7th grade level dating, is now being courted by the most famous billionaire in the country (also in his 20’s? really?), while his also presumably rich brother has hooked up with the roommate? These seemingly normal apartment-dwelling kids are double dating the most eligible bachelors since Zack broke it off with Kelly? Really?

- Enough with the half-naked morning piano playing of some melancholy concerto in E minor or whatever the fuck. We get it. He’s musically sophisticated. He’s a troubled soul. Learn the solo from Metallica’s One on guitar, you tousle-haired pussy.

- I’m not sure what you ladies feel when you have an orgasm, but this authors description makes it seem more like an acid trip than the best feeling on earth. She’s constantly “splintering into a million pieces,” or “falling apart beneath him.” Of course this is always followed by him “finding his release” immediately. This book has the most anti-climactic way of describing a climax.

- Her infatuation with him at the beginning is out of proportion with what she’s actually done with him. In other words, he’s just come over to her place and fucked her with his foil packet for the 3rd time, and she can’t stop swooning over the fact he has sent her an email? “My goodness, Christian Grey is emailing me?” Shouldn’t you have said “Christian Grey is pounding me from behind?” two hours ago? Really, it’s your email that’s making this all surreal?

But back to my initial point. What this book will teach impressionable fellas about what a girl wants is this: You have to be a neurotic, controlling, commanding, hyper-jealous stalking, endlessly wealthy young douchebag, with stop-everyone-mid-sentence-looks, who can fly anything, and fears nothing except commitment, abandonment, and being touched. Congratulations to our chubby author, you’ve just created a generation of men who think women get wet over being stalked through cell phone tower triangulation. At least the helicopter pilot instructor industry will endorse the book’s message.

I should mention though, a good female friend of mine read 50 Shades and absolutely hated it for the shit that it is. I sent her your post, and she loved it. So instead of thinking Christian Grey is the fantasy of every female, I came away realizing this: it is the fantasy of every female I would never want to be in a relationship with. If anything, that is what this book taught me.

I believe there are many ways you can tell a lot about a person. How they treat wait staff, the music they listen to, the way they talk to their momma. But now, I’m now adding “What did you think of 50 Shades of Grey” as a new way to ask someone, “are we compatible as far as anything in life goes?”

You can find more of Jeremy’s musings here!

Comments
19 Responses to “A Male Perspective: 50 Shades of…”
  1. Your first sentence summed it up – “this goddamn book”. I am writing snarky recaps of the series – I’m in the middle of the second book – and I consider this my revenge. I’m with you – I do not understand why women like a man that is both an emotional and physical abuser, a stalker, a creep, a jerk, a generally horrible excuse for a human. Except he’s nice looking and rich, and that makes it all better. Also, the girl he stalks is just as awful a person as he is, shallow and insensitive and jealous of every woman on earth. And women like this? Sometimes I’m embarrassed to be a woman.

    So glad to read this. Thanks.

  2. Reblogged this on aliceatwonderland and commented:
    This is a really great article about 50 shades from the male perspective. It is totally on target – funny and thought-provoking. Enjoy.

  3. Great post! I am so glad a guy got the balls to read this and give an honest opinion. Thank you for that! Goddamn this book!:)

  4. Lipstick Terrorist says:

    Not impressed you insulted the author by calling her chubby. On a feminist website? Really?

  5. “Deflating penises” – what a trip! Thanks for the laugh :)

    I have added “what do you think about Twilight?” to the questionnaire of potential friends, maybe I should add 50SoG…

  6. Joey Swails says:

    [Nigel is playing a soft piece on the piano]
    Marty DiBergi: It’s very pretty.
    Nigel Tufnel: Yeah, I’ve been fooling around with it for a few months.
    Marty DiBergi: It’s a bit of a departure from what you normally play.
    Nigel Tufnel: It’s part of a trilogy, a musical trilogy I’m working on in D minor… which is the saddest of all keys, I find. People weep instantly when they hear it, and I don’t know why.
    Marty DiBergi: It’s very nice.
    Nigel Tufnel: You know, just simple lines intertwining, you know, very much like – I’m really influenced by Mozart and Bach, and it’s sort of in between those, really. It’s like a Mach piece, really. It’s sort of…
    Marty DiBergi: What do you call this?
    Nigel Tufnel: Well, this piece is called “Lick My Love Pump”.

  7. Judith says:

    You article started off fantastically with “this goddamn book” and then just got better. I believe that Ms James just took her idiotic sexual fantasy and wrote it down!! It scares the shit out of me that THIS is what women fantasize about – I fear for my gender – really I do!!!

    Love your description of you dick as a deflated party balloon – had me LOLing out loud – humour like that is what gets me going.

    Since suffering the traumas of 50 Shades I have developed a special new kind of contempt for anyone who tells me that they enjoyed the book – makes me shrivel up a little inside.

  8. NZ Cate says:

    Excellent post about a goddamn awful book. I read 100 pages and just couldn’t do it too myself to read any more. Thank god we’re not all stereotypical female reader. I’m sure I’d have to top myself if I thought for one moment I was.

  9. Everytime I read something about it in mags or somewhere, they claim that every woman has this book because it brings ‘new fire in the bedroom” and stuff like that. But everytime an individual talks about it, they say how bad this book is.
    Strange :) .
    I’ve never been interested in this. I do not feel the need to read about other people screwing each other the entire time using handcuffs and stuff. Yawn. Maybe I don’t have the right to say this because I haven’t read it, but I really don’t get what’s all the fuss about.

  10. Pat Powers says:

    The column reads like someone from the cast of Seinfeld wrote it. They read 50 Shades and now they have another superficial reason for feeling superior to people. It does not seem to have occurred to the author that women might be able to read 50 Shades and understand that Christian Gray is a totally made up character, like Ana. A book does not have to feature spaceships and aliens to be an escapist fantasy.

  11. ivyspicy says:

    ” you will see my erection deflate and zip around the room like an untied party balloon”

  12. I thoroughly agree that this book did not warrant all the attention. Give me a bloody break, erotica training wheels me thinks.

    I found her age and inexperience a tremendous yawner. I am not titillated by a women’s inexperience or surrender to succumb.

    For some it is the thrill of the hunt, for me, always, the thrill of the kill. grrrrrrrrrrrrrr

    Sexual alchemy is to be delighted in, not forced upon another with perceived power imbalance.
    There is room to play in those roles but as a basis for the character’s unfolding relationship? yawn…

  13. YES YES YES!!! This book was complete and utter crap, poorly written by someone who has NEVER had sex. And really, women who read this…is spanking THAT risque? Is that the naughtiest thing you’ve ever done? Because then we have NOTHING in common.

  14. shannmark says:

    I loathed this book. What a pile of trash!

  15. queenofzenk says:

    I haven’t read this book (yet?.. haven’t decided quite) but it seems to me that it can’t be worse than Twilight. At least they actually “do it”.. if a book is supposed to be smutty, I want it to be smutty. And if it’s something women fantasize about, it doesn’t actually mean that it’s what they want in a real relationship. Books make it possible to read about and try out another way of living (adventurous, sexy, or whatever) without the commitment of doing it yourself.
    Having said that, I did really enjoy your review of the book.

    • bitchyeditor says:

      While they do ‘do it’ in this book, the euphemisms they use (down there, found his release) will make you so queasy you’ll wish they weren’t. This book took all the sexiness out of sex in our opinion. Thanks for enjoying our review!

  16. m3lly78 says:

    Gold. pure gold! Loved this recap!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 294 other followers

%d bloggers like this: